Share This Article
The ongoing conflict between the Select Board (SB) and the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) highlights a troubling disregard for trust and cooperation in our local government. On October 7, 2024, the ZBA unanimously passed a Motion of No confidence in Select Board member Charlie Russo as its liaison, citing his inability to be an impartial and constructive partner. (Two minutes into the video below.) Despite this, the SB refused the ZBA’s reasonable request for new liaison, deepening the rift and raising significant questions about leadership priorities.
The ZBA’s request was rooted in Mr. Russo’s July 16 public accusations, where he labeled the ZBA “a runaway, out-of-control board” and accused its members of misconduct. (54 minutes into the video below.) These claims were unsupported by any appeals, legal challenges, or overturned decisions. In fact, the ZBA’s record of accomplishments stands strong, with decisions grounded in legal advice and zoning regulations.
What is particularly alarming is the timing and manner of Mr. Russo’s accusations. They came during a Select Board meeting when two veteran ZBA members were up for reappointment, blindsiding the ZBA without prior notice or an opportunity to respond. This public airing of grievances not only lacked basic respect but also the collaborative spirit necessary for effective governance.
The SB’s refusal to appoint a new liaison appears to be less about governance and more about retribution. The ZBA’s opposition to the controversial firearms bylaw article earlier this year, which Mr. Russo and other SB members heavily promoted, seems to have fueled the animosity, but the lingering fallout has led to unnecessary acrimony and a power struggle that does not serve the community.
To restore trust and move forward, the Select Board must prioritize the best interests of the community. First, they should honor the ZBA’s request for a new liaison. Second, they must set up clearer protocols for addressing inter-board conflicts with fairness and transparency. Finally, the Select Board must show a commitment to collaboration over political grievances.
The community deserves leaders who act with integrity and prioritize the public good. Not doing so only deepens divisions and discourages residents from taking part in local government—a cost too great for any town to bear.