Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Category image

Opinion

Article 54 is a Disservice to Sudbury — Vote No
By Janie Dretler, Member, Sudbury Select Board - I am writing this as an individual member of the Sudbury Select Board. These views are my own. Article 54 — a citizen petition to cut Sudbury’s Community Preservation Act (CPA) surcharge from 3% to 1.5% — is not just misguided. It is shortsighted, reckless, and…
A Letter Regarding the Select Board Vote to Not Support Article 46 – A Call for Responsible Affordable Housing
Dear Select Board, Finance Committee, and Sudbury Residents Thank you to the Select Board for your decision to not support Article 46. Residents of Sudbury appreciate your thoughtful questioning of the Sudbury Housing Authority’s proposed duplex project, comments about the sentiments of the community, acknowledgement that alternative options were not explored, lack of financial clarity/prudence…
Closing Thoughts
Dear Sudbury: As the annual town election day dawns tomorrow (MONDAY 3/31), I am grateful to all of you for your time in listening to my vision for Sudbury, my record of service, and my answers to your questions. I thank all of you who cheered me, talked to me, opened their doors for…
This Pop-up Is Included in the Theme
Best Choice for Creatives
Purchase Now